Skip Navigation Links weather.gov 
NOAA logo - Click to go to the NOAA homepage National Weather Service   NWS logo - Click to go to the NWS homepage
The Weather Prediction Center

 
 

 

Follow the Weather Prediction Center on Facebook Follow the Weather Prediction Center on Twitter
NCEP Quarterly Newsletter
WPC Home
Analyses and Forecasts
   National High & Low
   WPC Discussions
   Surface Analysis
   Days ½-2½ CONUS
   Days 3-7 CONUS
   Days 4-8 Alaska
   QPF
   PQPF
   Flood Outlook
   Winter Weather
   Storm Summaries
   Heat Index
   Tropical Products
   Daily Weather Map
   GIS Products
Current Watches/
Warnings

Satellite and Radar Imagery
  GOES-East Satellite
  GOES-West Satellite
  National Radar
Product Archive
WPC Verification
   QPF
   Medium Range
   Model Diagnostics
   Event Reviews
   Winter Weather
International Desks
Development and Training
   Development
WPC Overview
   About the WPC
   Staff
   WPC History
   Accomplishments
   Other Sites
   FAQs
Meteorological Calculators
Contact Us
   About Our Site
 
USA.gov is the U.S. Government's official web portal to all federal, state, and local government web resources and services.
 
Model Diagnostics Discussion
 
(Latest Discussion - Issued 0647Z Mar 21, 2019)
 
Version Selection
Versions back from latest:  0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   
 
Abbreviations and acronyms used in this product
 
Geographic Boundaries -  Map 1: Color  Black/White       Map 2: Color  Black/White


Model Diagnostic Discussion
NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD
247 AM EDT Thu Mar 21 2019

Valid Mar 21/0000 UTC thru Mar 24/1200 UTC

...See NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) for the status of the upper air
ingest...

00Z Model Evaluation Including Preferences and Confidence
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

...Trough(s) and Developing Low in the East...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Preference: General model blend (weight to ECMWF/GFS/UKMET)
Confidence: Slightly above average

07z update: With the rest of the 00z guidance now available, the
agreement has improved and now the CMC mirrors  the rest of the
guidance very well. As such, a general model blend can be used for
the east coast system mass fields.

---previous discussion---
Two pieces of mid/upper level energy rotating through the Great
Lakes and Mid-Atlantic regions will phase in the next 24-48 hours
over the Northeast US, eventually closing off Friday night off the
Northeast US coast. A surface low, currently near the SC/NC
border, will track up the East Coast, deepening as it moves toward
the Gulf of Maine. Mass fields between the various deterministic
models are in much better agreement compared to the past few
cycles, particularly in the first 24-36 hours. The mid/upper level
pattern is fairly similar across the board, while at the surface,
there remains a few differences in the track/position. The 12z CMC
is further east compared to the model consensus, while the rest of
the guidance is nearly identical in track and magnitude. As such,
will lean on a non-CMC blend for this system with the heaviest
weight given to the ECMWF/GFS/UKMET.


...Remainder of the CONUS...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Preference: General model blend
Confidence: Average

07z update: The rest of the 00z guidance looks reasonable for the
western/central US through the period. The preference for a
general model blend continues.

---previous discussion---
The strong elongated ridge in place across the Plains will
continue early in the forecast period while a slightly negatively
titled trough weakens and splits as it moves onshore the west
coast. The main energy source will pinch off toward the Southwest
US, eventually closing off over Utah by Friday. Through then,
model agreement is above average and a general model blend can be
used for the mass fields.

Some of that energy eventually makes it way toward the central
Plains by Saturday where there are some disagreements in timing
and location. The ECMWF is further south with the mid/upper low
position compared to the CMC which is on the northern edge of the
model consensus. The latest (00z) GFS/NAM split the difference but
appear to be slightly faster as well. But overall, the differences
are not substantial and a general model blend probably would yield
a reasonable result for 3 days out.

Weak troughing will remain in place across northern California
into the Pacific Northwest for the end of the forecast period.
There are differences on how strong (south) the trough influence
is, but again, model differences are not significant enough to
lean/prefer one solution over another.


Model trends at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/model2.shtml
500 mb forecasts at www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/h5pref/h5pref.shtml

Taylor